Ask the Grinding Doc
Dear Doc: What’s more important when specing out a grinding machine: motor power or stiffness?
Dear Doc: What’s more important when specing out a grinding machine: motor power or stiffness?
The Doc replies: Stiffness. I almost never see a grinding machine maxing out its motor. In fact, most motors, even in rough grinding, are running at maybe 30% of their maximum horsepower.
But low stiffness? That causes all sorts of problems: deflection in grinding and in dressing, increased chatter risk, the wheel not biting into the part during finish grinding, etc. If I’m suffering in grinding — burn, chatter, surface finish, long cycle times, deflection, and just about any problem — I seldom go to the back of the machine and look at the spindle-motor plate. Instead, I measure the stiffness. What do I find? That I’m working on an unstiff machine. I then have to lower my expectations: lower material removal rates, longer cycle times, more headaches.
That’s one reason why I like machines from the 1960s and 1970s: they’re often super stiff. Sure, they weigh several tons. But all that weight usually means higher stiffness.
If somebody said to me: “We’re designing a new machine. We can give you double the motor power but half the stiffness. Or we can give you half the motor power but double the stiffness.” Not knowing anything else, I would take the double stiffness every time.
Dear Doc: I have chatter marks on my workpiece. Is there a quick way to determine if it’s coming from an outof-balance or eccentric wheel?
The Doc replies: Yes. Easy. First, take 4″ (100 mm) of length in the ground workpiece in the direction of grind (for surface grinding or cylindrical grinding). Then count the number of chatter marks (or chatters). Divide the number of chatters by 4″ (or 100 mm). That’ll give you the number of chatters per inch (or millimeter). Now take the workpiece surface velocity and multiply by the number of chatters per inch (or millimeter). That’ll give the chatter frequency in chatters per minute. (Yes, chatter is usually given in chatters per second, or Hz, but here we’re doing it in chatters per minute.)
If that result is close to the wheel rpm — maybe within ±10% — then those chatter marks might be caused by an out-of-balance or eccentric wheel. If the answer isn’t close, then your chatter is coming from somewhere else.
An example: Joe the Grinder counts 57 chatters in 100 mm. His chatter spacing is 0.57 chatters per millimeter (57 ÷ 100). His workpiece is running at 3,000 mm/minute. His chatter frequency is 1,710 chatters/minute (0.57 × 3,000). His wheel is running at 1,800 rpm. Joe decides 1,710 chatters/minute is close to 1,800 rpm, and concludes he may have an out-of-balance or eccentric wheel.
Review the print ads from this magazine to continue
This quick advertiser review unlocks the rest of the article and keeps the full-screen reader focused on the ads instead of the page chrome.
Advertisers included in this article experience
Print placements connected to this article
Sandvik
Time for change
Time for change Visit sandvik.coromant.com to learn more.
Visit Sandvik View this placement in the issue recordPrint ads from this magazine
Time for change Visit sandvik.coromant.com to learn more.
Continue reading
March 2026
Another example: Joe the Grinder counts 157 chatters in 100 mm. His chatter spacing is 1.57 chatters per millimeter. His workpiece is still running at 3,000 mm/minute. His chatter frequency is 4,710 chatters/minute. His wheel is running at 1,800 rpm. Joe decides that 4,710 chatters/minute isn’t close to 1,800 rpm, and concludes that his chatter isn’t caused by an out-ofbalance or eccentric wheel.
Dear Doc: I’m doing a cylindrical OD grind in a steel shaft, putting a form into the workpiece. My wheel supplier gave me an H-grade wheel. That seems off. Am I right?
The Doc replies: That’s definitely off. Cylindrical-OD operations have a short arc length. Therefore, your starting point is a harder-graded wheel. My chart in The Book of Grinding puts OD in the range of J-grade to O-grade. If we have a flat 1A1 wheel, then J-grade works. If we’re putting a form in, you need closer to N.
Maybe. Mostly. But there are other factors. Are we worried about burn? Then move to a grade softer, from N to M or L. Are we grinding a difficult-to-grind grade of high-speed steel? The workpiece will dull the wheel, so we need to release those dull grits. Therefore, we go a grade softer, say from M to L. Do we have a small wheel diameter and a fixed wheel RPM? That means a slower wheel surface speed, meaning we have to go a grade harder. Now we’re up to O. Unless it’s a slow wheel surface speed and a nasty high-speed steel, so we’re at N. Or M. Or something else.
None of this is an exact science. And every wheel manufacturer is different in terms of how hard their wheels are. If your salesperson says, “These wheels tend to run hard,” then go a grade softer than usual.
But H? That’s too soft for just about all cylindrical-OD operations with a form.
about the author



MFGAxis Discussion