A little math equals a lot of safety

A little math equals a lot of safety

Machine economically and safely by estimating the forces involved with aggressive metal removal.

September 7, 2022By Brandt Taylor

In my previous column, I went through how to hold an 11"-dia.-by-2"-thick workpiece on a 6" milling vise. This column will showcase a little math to estimate forces involved with aggressive metal removal. In this way, it is possible to machine economically and safely. The drawing shows the problem.

This 190-cubic-inch piece of stock is going to turn into a 75-cubic-inch finished part. To begin, 40 cubic inches will be removed from the outside diameter above where the part is clamped in the vise. When roughing, I use corncob endmills that have little bumps on the flutes, but the math that I use is adaptable to whatever tools you like.

In the drawing, when the tool moves laterally into the workpiece or moves radially around the workpiece center, it will make tangential cutting force CF, which will resolve itself into a horizontal and a vertical component determined by angle a. At the tool, that produces vertical force VFT, which is CF tan a, or CF times a/d. The important thing to consider is the vertical force at the vise jaw clamping surface VFJ, which is higher than VFT because of mechanics. VFJ equals VFT times d/d-c.

If VFJ gets close to the vertical holding power of the clamping surface, then there will be trouble. In the article about the vise jaws for this part, it was determined that 3,600 lbs. of vertical force could be resisted by the steel back jaw holding this aluminum part. There are two clamping surfaces on this jaw, so that's 1,800 lbs. per surface.

Cutting speed and chip thickness are best determined the normal way to maximize tool economy, but the depth and width of cut can be adjusted for good, safe metal removal.

This 190-cubic-inch piece of stock is going to turn into a 75-cubic-inch finished part.

This 190-cubic-inch piece of stock is going to turn into a 75-cubic-inch finished part. Image courtesy of B. Taylor

Determining CF is the key to the puzzle. The tensile strength of the workpiece with the size and number of the chips will give a useful number.

CF = TGNHJR/W

Where

T = tensile strength of the
workpiece

G = width of the chips (for some tools, this is the depth of cut)

H = chip thickness

J = (number of flutes)/2

R = tool radius

W = horizontal width of cut

If

T = 40,000

G = 0.125

H = 0.01

N = 8

J = 2

R = 0.5

W = 0.65

Then CF = 800 lbs.

This has worked for me. It's overkill in most situations, and of course it can be improved. But it gives a relationship between workpiece tensile strength and metal removal rate, and it's quick and easy to use.

One thing more: If your cutting tool has a helix angle, the cutting force produces a vertical force pulling the part out of the vise and the endmill out of its holder. If you know CF, you can estimate this force too. Safety pays.

Glossary terms in this article

  • tensile strength
    In tensile testing, the ratio of maximum load to original cross-sectional area. Also called ultimate strength. Compare with yield strength.
  • cutting force
    Engagement of a tool’s cutting edge with a workpiece generates a cutting force. Such a cutting force combines tangential, feed and radial forces, which can be measured by a dynamom…
  • cutting speed
    Tangential velocity on the surface of the tool or workpiece at the cutting interface. The formula for cutting speed (sfm) is tool diameter 5 0.26 5 spindle speed (rpm). The formula…
  • depth of cut
    Distance between the bottom of the cut and the uncut surface of the workpiece, measured in a direction at right angles to the machined surface of the workpiece.
  • width of cut
    Width of the milled surface, reflecting a face milling cutter’s radial engagement, and a peripheral milling cutter’s axial engagement, in the cut.
  • helix angle
    Angle that the tool’s leading edge makes with the plane of its centerline.