Damping vibration for productivity: Turning Performance

Diversification is essential to successfully navigate a changing market landscape. For Indian Mountain Machine Shop Inc., integrating a new customer required the purchase of anti-vibration tool bodies, or toolholders, when turning parts with challenging features and surface finish specifications. The shop has 12 employees and operates nine CNC lathes and four CNC mills, in addition to a couple of rarely used manual machines.

Located in Jellico, Tennessee, Indian Mountain Machine Shop has long served some of the bigger names in the mining and excavating industries, but owner and operator Jerry McNealy said that part of the business has fallen off in the past six or seven years. To help fill this gap, the shop landed work turning long, thin parts made of 6061 aluminum in which their aesthetics played an equal if not more important role to the tolerances when produced.

“Their claim to fame is cosmetics,” he said. “The parts require a fine surface finish because the customer polishes many of the components to impart a 0.0254 to 0.0508 µm (1 to 2 µin.) surface finish prior to plating them, sometimes with gold.”

McNealy said the worse the finish is when coming off the turning center, the longer the customer then must spend polishing, some of which involves intensive, expensive manual labor.

Jerry McNealy, owner and operator of Indian Mountain Machine Shop, displays thin-wall aluminum parts produced on a Mazak turning center with an STMD anti-vibration tool body from MAQ. Image courtesy of Indian Mountain Machine Shop

“What I give them is anywhere from a 20 to 30 µin. (0.508 to 0.762 µm),” he said.

Achieving that finish with the several brands of anti-vibration bars that Indian Mountain Machine Shop had for holding turning inserts required running at a low
spindle speed, such as 300 rpm, and a corresponding low feed rate. As a result, McNealy said the project would consume too much time and that the finish still would not be fine enough.

“When we first began running the parts, I went over to my toolbox and got the best 1.25″ (31.75 mm) anti-vibe bar that we’d previously had, thinking that we might just try with it first and see how it went,” he said about turning parts that were 228.6 mm (9″) long. “Using this bar, however, we only ended up with what I figured to be a low rpm, slow speed and a very poor finish. This particular part we were working on was going to take up to an hour and 15 minutes to rough and finish the bore.”

For a solution, McNealy turned to Gary McNealy, a cousin who previously had worked at the shop and is now a territory manager for industrial distributor Jones Marketing Inc. in Jellico. Gary suggested an anti-vibration tool body that features a self-tuning mass damper from Saltsjo-Boo, Sweden-based MAQ AB.

“I said, ‘I’d try one, and the timing couldn’t be better,'” Jerry said.