Out with the old: General Industry Coverage
A model-based design and verification method for reducing the time to build complex vehicles and aircraft.
Building large, complex systems, such as military vehicles and aircraft, is a time-consuming and often wasteful and unpredictable process. The problem is that manufacturers rely on a method that has been in place since the dawn of the Industrial Revolution: design, prototype, test, correct and retest. The Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA), however, wants a new amphibious vehicle for the U.S. military built in about one-fifth the time it would typically take—along with the corresponding cost reduction—while achieving the desired performance.
In an attempt to achieve that, the agency created FANG (Fast, Adaptive, Next-generation Ground vehicle) design challenges, with the first of three launched early this year. DARPA invited engineers and students to use the tools developed by universities and agencies working on the problem.
One of the schools is Oregon State University. OSU is developing a concept called “model-based design and verification,” where virtually all of the design, testing, error identification and revisions will be done on a computer up to the point of commercial production, explained Irem Y. Tumer, associate professor of mechanical engineering at OSU’s School of Mechanical, Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering.
“Most of our work looks at how component failures in a large system like an amphibious fighting vehicle will propagate through the system and then simulate what specific functionality will be lost,” Tumer said. “We want to know early on in the design stages, before we actually have detailed models, what functionality we should be paying attention to, what is safe and what is unsafe, and what types of reliability problems we will have.”
Review the print ads from this magazine to continue
This quick advertiser review unlocks the rest of the article and keeps the full-screen reader focused on the ads instead of the page chrome.


MFGAxis Discussion