Ask The Grinding Doc: Decrease diameter, increase speed

Dear Doc: I installed a variable-speed drive on a cylindrical grinder. The wheels start at 18" and stub-out at 15". Should I increase the rpm as the wheel diameter gets smaller? Read the full report for the Doc's reply.

February 15, 2017By Jeffrey Badger, Ph.D.

Open Flipbook

Dear Doc: I installed a variable-speed drive on a cylindrical grinder. The wheels start at 18″ and stub-out at 15″. Should I increase the rpm as the wheel diameter gets smaller?

The Doc Replies: If you want more consistent grinding, maintain a constant surface speed. The basic equation is: new rpm = original rpm × original diameter ÷ current diameter. So, if you were happily running your new 18″ wheel at 1,800 rpm, once it gets down to 15″, run it at 2,160 rpm (1,800 × 18 ÷ 15). Be sure to stay within the maximum safe speed printed on the wheel

Ask The Grinding Doc: Decrease diameter, increase speed
The steps to measure wheel wear with the “razor blade test.” Image courtesy of J. Badger.

That’ll help you maintain a fairly constant chip load during grinding. As the wheel diameter gets smaller, the grinding arc length gets smaller, meaning fewer grits are in the action. If you want to maintain exactly the same chip load, the equation is: new rpm = original rpm × (original diameter ÷ current diameter)^1.5. So, if you were running your new 18″ wheel at 1,800 rpm, run it at 2,366 rpm [1,800 × (18 ÷ 15)^1.5] once it gets down to 15″—again, within the safe speed.

If the CNC program inputs surface speed and not rpm, the equation is: new surface speed = original surface speed × √(original diameter ÷ current diameter). So, if you were running your new 18″ wheel at 8,500 sfm, once it gets down to 15″, run it at 9,311 sfm [8,500 × √(18 ÷ 15)].

Finish task to continue reading

Review the print ads from this magazine to continue

This quick advertiser review unlocks the rest of the article and keeps the full-screen reader focused on the ads instead of the page chrome.

Advertisers included in this article experience

Print placements connected to this article

Toolflo

Your Threading Specialist!

CHASERSAPI Threading chasers! • Buttress, WW, NPT, Rounds... Superior coatings! Combination Bar FLO-LOCK Turning ,Threading and Facing ON-EDGE All-in-one! LAYDOWN Thousands of new items added to our new Threading Catalog! State of the art coatings! Pressed, ground and raised chip breakers! THREADMILLING Indexible and solid threadmills!

Your Threading Specialist! CHASERSAPI Threading chasers! • Buttress, WW, NPT, Rounds... Superior coatings! Combination Bar FLO-LOCK Turning ,Threading and Facing ON-EDGE All-in-one! LAYDOWN

Print page 3 Published 2017-02-15

Visit Toolflo View this placement in the issue record

The one thing you can’t correct for is that the smaller-diameter wheel now has a smaller circumference, meaning fewer abrasive grits are available to do the work. When a wheel goes from 18″ to 15″, you can expect 20 percent greater radial wheel wear (18 ÷ 15 = 1.2 = a 20 percent increase). Theoretically, you should have to dress 20 percent more often and expect 20 percent more radial form loss.

Dear Doc: In a previous column, you covered a “razor blade test” for measuring wheel wear. How does that work?

The Doc Replies: Let’s say a wheel is 2″ wide, and you grind a workpiece that’s 1″ wide. That leaves a step in the wheel. Mount a thin piece of material, such as a razor blade or piece of graphite, into a vise and gently plunge the wheel into it. That step is reproduced in the razor blade.

Then use a depth micrometer, an optical microscope or a scanning electron microscope to measure the height of the step. Plug that into the formula for G ratio to assess the relative wheel wear between different wheels, coolants and parameters: G ratio = (depth ground × length ground) ÷ (π × wheel diameter × step height). There are fancier ways to measure wheel wear using optics, lasers and acoustics, but this tried-and-true method is easy, reliable and accurate.

The razor blade test is more geared toward the lab than for production.