Skip to content
From Cutting Tool Engineering

Buying time: Turning Performance

Using standard tooling on a CNC lathe means leaving money on the table, according to the cover story in the April 2013 issue of Cutting Tool Engineering magazine.

April 15, 2013By Kip Hanson

Using standard tooling on a CNC lathe means leaving money on the table.

It’s the 47th lap of the Indianapolis 500. You’ve been leading the pack all morning but the left rear tire is getting a bit squishy. After signaling the crew to get ready, you barrel down pit lane and slide to a stop before the garage, just as the tire changers come running out equipped with … monkey wrenches?

To a racecar driver, quick changeover means the difference between victory and defeat. But it seems machine shop owners and manufacturing engineers aren’t getting the message. Talk to most any machine tool expert and you’ll hear the same thing: fewer than 10 percent of all 2-axis lathes are equipped with quick-change tooling.

That Stuff Ain’t Cheap!

“A lot of people don’t see the benefit of quick-change,” said Michael Minton, national application engineering manager for Methods Machine Tools Inc., Sudbury, Mass. “People are looking for ways to reduce setup time, but the perception of high cost gets in the way of the benefit of quick-change. Machine and tooling suppliers need to do a better job of explaining the technology to end users. Given the proper application, the benefits clearly outweigh the cost.”

Sandvik_070381.tif

Courtesy of Sandvik Coromant

Quick-change tooling on a twin-spindle machine.

Quick-change toolholders cost several hundred dollars each. The blocks to mount them to the turret could be more expensive than a Caribbean cruise. Adding insult to injury, lead times can be long. Once you’ve purchased a new CNC machine, you might wait 8 to 10 weeks for delivery of a quick-change tooling package and spend another 20 percent over the machine’s $150,000 price tag. “It is very hard to convince a guy who just bought a 2-axis lathe that it’s a viable solution,” Minton said.

It sounds like a lot of money. But do the math: Assuming quick-change tooling reduces downtime by 1 hour per day, a shop charging $80 per hour could save more than $20,000 annually per machine. A tool change with a conventional holder might take 10 to 15 minutes, according to Minton, but takes 1 minute or less with a quick-change holder.

“For a job shop doing two to three setups a day, it could be very advantageous,” Minton said. “Some manufacturing companies are looking at single-piece part flow or deal with just-in-time manufacturing, where small lot sizes are the norm. Here, you don’t have a whole lot of choice—go quick-change or spend a lot of time setting up.”

Superhard_PCBN_Action_Shot_A140.tif

Courtesy of Kennametal

A square-shank Kennametal quick-change toolholder and insert face cast iron without coolant.

Despite this, Minton said the biggest opportunity for quick-change holders is on multitask machines. “On a regular 2-axis lathe, most of the tools reside on the machine anyway. Certainly, the OD tools—roughing, finishing, cutoff, grooving and threading—are there all the time. It’s the ID tools that change between setups: the drills, boring bars and grooving tools.”

So unless there is a high-tool-wear situation that requires changing inserts several times an hour or the low-volume scenario previously described, it might be difficult to sell the advantage of quick-change on a 2-axis lathe, according to Minton. “But on a multitasking machine, it’s far more advantageous,” he said.

On a mill/turn center with two or three turrets, setup can get quite involved. “You might be looking at several dozen tools, and quite a few of those could be live,” Minton said. “Unlike a machining center, where you can load tools in the magazine while the machine is running, the only way to load new tools on a mill/turn machine [without quick-change] is to take the machine out of service. In this situation, you should certainly evaluate quick-change.”

What’s the Holdup?

So, if quick-change tooling is such as good idea, why don’t more shops use it? “It’s a mindset,” said David Fischer, lathe product specialist at Okuma America Corp., Charlotte, N.C. “In the majority of shops, particularly those with repetitive or low-volume work, quick-change would be a tremendous advantage. I really don’t get why they haven’t embraced this more. It would make them more competitive than they can possibly realize.”

Fischer agreed that it frequently comes down to cost. “Most of them look at it and say, ‘Wow, those are expensive toolholders.’ But you have to look at this long term. What is your payback over a year’s time? How many times do you change tools and how many setups do you do? With a fully implemented quick-change system, you can go from hours of setup time to just a few minutes.

“There’s a lot more to it than changeover,” Fischer added. “You get to the point where you don’t care about the interruptions. For example, a customer calls and wants to drop an order in. If your setup only takes 15 minutes, who cares? So aside from saving money, now you can provide better customer service and win more business as a result.”

Still, setup time reduction isn’t as simple as running out and buying a bunch of quick-change holders. Staff and equipment are needed to support it, including a setup man, a programmer and a toolcrib to set the tools. “Everyone on the team has to embrace the concept and be confident the guy next to them isn’t dropping the ball,” Fischer said.

To this point, one big piece of the quick-change puzzle is offline presetting. Most shops still use touch setters on a machine, but that doesn’t make sense for a piece of CNC equipment. A better approach is presetting tools in the crib. When the operator takes a replacement tool, the presetter sends the offset to the machine and machining can begin.

“Very few people do it that way, and that means poor use of machine time,” Fischer said. “It’s interesting how the issue of cost—say, the cost of a presetter for the toolcrib—can very quickly trip people up from doing something that would otherwise save them a ton of money. Long term, a company can jeopardize its ability to compete. Most shops guess their uptime to be way higher than it is, but they’re just kidding themselves.”

One Size Doesn’t Fit All

If this is the best thing since sliced bread, why aren’t machine tool builders equipping their CNC lathes with quick-change-capable turrets? That would certainly go a long way toward reducing the high investment cost. Fischer explained that some builders have tried this, but met with poor results.

“If you buy a machine with a turret dedicated to one brand of quick-change tooling, you’re really locked in,” he said. “And there are very few situations where every tool you’re going to use has a quick-change adapter. So if my turret is dedicated to KM or Capto [quick-change tooling], that’s great, so long as every tool I’m going to use—ever—is available in that platform.

“Most shops are not going to be all Kennametal [KM] or all Sandvik [Capto],” he continued. “And it’s very unlikely you’re going to find one system that meets every need. Boring bars, especially, are a problem, because you’re locked into whatever length is available for the toolholder. There are times when you might have chatter issues and you’ll need to adjust bar length to maximize your reach and minimize your chatter. If you’re tied into one system, maybe you can’t do that.”

Fischer pointed out another flaw of dedicated quick-change turrets: stuff happens. “With our turrets, you have to mount a quick-change tool block of some sort. This makes it easy to mix and match different tooling systems. But the nice thing is, if you have a crash, you can replace the block and you’re back in business. It’s not like you have to rebuild the turret. This not only gives you a lot more flexibility, but less risk of extended downtime for machine repair.”

Jim Grimes, senior product specialist for machine tool integration at Sandvik Coromant Co., Fair Lawn, N.J., agreed: “Machine builders are not integrating quick-change out of the factory. It’s usually our responsibility as cutting tool manufacturers to bring it to market. Most customers want to buy a standard machine, so we’ve developed a program of machine-adapted clamping units for specific machine tool models.”

Sandvik_070638.tif

Courtesy of Sandvik Coromant

Integrated cooling allows for efficient chip evacuation during a boring operation using a quick-change head.

Finish task to continue reading

Review the print ads from this magazine to continue

This quick advertiser review unlocks the rest of the article and keeps the full-screen reader focused on the ads instead of the page chrome.

MFGAxis MFGAxis Discussion Be part of the shop-floor conversation Like, save, or comment on this CTE story.
Be the first to engage.

MFGAxis Discussion

Be the first to engage.
Scroll for the next article