Skip to content
From Cutting Tool Engineering

Dress in the front or rear?

Dear Doc: We have two dressers on our machine — one mounted behind the wheel and one mounted on the bed. Some operators like the one behind, and some like the one on the bed. Which do you prefer?

May 15, 2021By Jeffrey A. Badger, Ph.D.

Dear Doc: We have two dressers on our machine — one mounted behind the wheel and one mounted on the bed. Some operators like the one behind, and some like the one on the bed. Which do you prefer?

The Doc replies: My answer is the always popular “It depends.” There are four factors to consider, probably in this order: stiffness, cycle time, chatter and alignment. Let’s take them one by one.

First, rear-mounted, or top-mounted, dressing units consistently have less stiffness than those mounted on a bed. This may not be a problem. If it is, several issues can arise from a lack of stiffness.

Chatter could occur during dressing. With plunge rolls, this puts straight-line chatter into the wheel, which ends up being imparted into the workpiece in the form of straight-line chatter. With traverse-style dressing, this puts a “fish scale pattern” into the wheel, which imparts a fish scale pattern into the workpiece.

Longer dwell times could be required when rotary plunge dressing to get the final form, which can dull the wheel.

There could be deflection in the dresser, which can result in a taper in the wheel and therefore the part.

Finish task to continue reading

Review the print ads from this magazine to continue

This quick advertiser review unlocks the rest of the article and keeps the full-screen reader focused on the ads instead of the page chrome.

MFGAxis MFGAxis Discussion Be part of the shop-floor conversation Like, save, or comment on this CTE story.
Be the first to engage.

MFGAxis Discussion

Be the first to engage.
Scroll for the next article