Skip to content
From Cutting Tool Engineering

A firm grip: Turning Performance

A host of different toolholders are available, including endmill holders, milling chucks, collet chucks, hydraulic chucks and shrink-fit holders, as well as tool bodies for holding inserts to perform operations such as turning, grooving and parting off. To optimize machine tool performance, end users must consider a variety of elements, depending on the application.

April 15, 2024By Alan Richter

A host of different toolholders are available, including endmill holders, milling chucks, collet chucks, hydraulic chucks and shrink-fit holders, as well as tool bodies for holding inserts to perform operations such as turning, grooving and parting off. To optimize machine tool performance, end users must consider a variety of elements, depending on the application.

One critical consideration is rigidity of the entire toolholding assembly from the machine spindle to the tool tip. The most rigid toolholder type remains the endmill holder, according to Frank Fullone, general manager of Lyndex-Nikken Inc. in Mundelein, Illinois. Unfortunately, an endmill holder is not conducive to maintaining a low total indicator runout, another key consideration.

That “old technology” design requires tightening a lock screw on a flat or Weldon shank to securely clamp the cutting tool, explained Michael Herman, vice president of sales for BIG DAISHOWA Inc. in Hoffman Estates, Illinois. Tightening the screw elliptically pushes the tool off center in the holder. “That gives 100% security for the tool not coming out, but it’s probably the worst-case scenario as far as the TIR on the tool.”

Big Daishowa

BIG DAISHOWA reports that its Mega New Baby collet chucks provide excellent clamping and runout accuracy, and have a positive impact on part quality, surface finish, tool life and machine utilization. Image courtesy of Big Daishowa

The next option is a milling chuck, Herman said, which is a mechanical chuck with needle bearings pitched at a slight angle. The runout is less than 0.01 mm (0.0004″) at four times diameter.

He added that another measurement for TIR is made at the face of the collet. “Generally speaking, if you improve TIR by 0.001″, you’re improving your tool life and your cost by 10%.”

For high-speed applications, the toolmaker offers Mega New Baby collet chucks, which provide excellent clamping and runout accuracy, according to Herman. The company reports that every collet is inspected twice to guarantee runout accuracy of 0.0004″ at the collet nose and 0.00012″ at four times diameter.

A shrink-fit holder provides a high degree of tool security, Herman noted, if the tool shank is ground to the correct H tolerance. For example, a shank that is ground undersized slightly will reduce the clamping pressure, or gripping force — another key consideration.

“Ultimately, the best choice is a hydraulic chuck,” he said, “and that is also the best because it gives you some dampening effect. It’s a very easy solution for an operator to mechanically tighten the screw, which compresses the bladder 360° around the tool itself.”

The contact between the toolholder taper and the machine spindle taper is of key importance for rigidity, Fullone said, because that is the largest surface area in contact with the spindle. “The greater the surface area that you have, of course, the greater rigidity you have.”

Lyndex-Nikken

The Slim Chuck SK collets have an 8° taper, which doubles the gripping force compared to an ER collet. Image courtesy of Lyndex-Nikken ” data-entity-type=”file” data-entity-uuid=”6e8467e7-812e-4284-963d-c43c67e765e9″ height=”343″ src=”/wp-content/uploads/legacy/inline-images/SK%20Chuck%20Shoulder%20pushing_0.jpg” width=”600″ />When high-speed machining, however, there is a tendency for the machine spindle to bell mouth, reducing the amount of contact between a steep taper holder and the spindle, Fullone explained. Also, in very rigid machining, the tool tends to bend or slightly pull out of the spindle, depending on the cutting forces. To increase the bending moment of the tool and help overcome those tendencies, Lyndex-Nikken offers dual contact holders that contact both the spindle and tool face.In addition, the company offers Slim Chuck SK collets, Fullone said, which has an 8° taper that reportedly doubles the gripping force of an ER collet. “The one that we find is most successful with respect to rigidity is our SK system by Nikken.”He added that the company uses a TiN-coated bearing nut in its SK collet chucks to increase tool rigidity and toolholder accuracy by not causing the collet to become twisted or contorted as a result of the friction between the collet and nut as it is being tightened. “That TiN bearing nut does a world of wonders for concentricity and for gripping force — sometimes almost immeasurable.”Minimizing DeflectionBIG DAISHOWA also offers a dual contact spindle system where the shank contacts the spindle taper and the spindle face simultaneously to minimize deflection and enhance machining rigidity. Called BIG-PLUS, Herman emphasized that BIG DAISHOWA originated the concept, which is licensed to a small number of other manufacturers that can meet its high standards. “Not all dual contact is the same. We hold the master gauges for BIG-PLUS, or dual contact. We always have the face and taper contact, and we never lose the Z orientation.”Nonetheless, the more taper contact, the better the performance, Herman noted. While a taper contact of 85% to 90% is often considered ideal, too much contact can cause issues. “If you start getting to a 95% taper grind, you can basically have a lock fit and the toolholder becomes harder to release if it’s not ground properly.”BIG DAISHOWA hydraulic chucks have precise runout accuracy of less than 0.00012” at 4 times diameter and reportedly improve the workpiece surface finish and extend tool life. Image courtesy of BIG DAISHOWA

He added that there is a certain amount of micro elasticity that occurs, enabling the spindle to open slightly and accept the holder. That capability is beneficial because BIG DAISHOWA targets an AT2 angle tolerance for its holders.

Other toolholder manufacturers, such as Lyndex-Nikken, use AT3 as the standard for holders, Fullone said. “The AT2 tolerance is generally used for the angle tolerance of the spindle, because although you could achieve an AT2 tolerance on a toolholder, the problem that you have is such a tight fit that tool changing would become difficult.”

Even if a part manufacturer has high-quality toolholders, they must be properly maintained to function as designed, Herman said. For instance, an endmill should be thoroughly cleaned and dried before being inserted into any type of clamping system.

However, a tool shank can be ground to achieve an extremely fine finish and improve TIR that it slips out slightly when held in a hydraulic chuck or shrink-fit holder, Herman added. “The surface finish is so good there’s nothing to really clamp onto.”

After purchasing a new machine tool, Herman recommended, end users should consider purchasing new toolholders, especially to replace older tooling even though they have a perceived value. “Everything on that toolholder is transferred to the new spindle. You will lose accuracies from day one by using old tools that could be damaged.”

Finish task to continue reading

Review the print ads from this magazine to continue

This quick advertiser review unlocks the rest of the article and keeps the full-screen reader focused on the ads instead of the page chrome.

Scroll for the next article