Skip to content
From Cutting Tool Engineering

Getting ‘goodies’? Make sure they’ll be used

Do your homework when adding labor-saving devices to your shop, urges the Shop Technology column in the September 2014 issue of Cutting Tool Engineering magazine.

September 15, 2014By Christopher Tate

Manufacturing documentaries produced by automakers in the 1950s and ’60s are fascinating to me, especially the ones that focus on “labor-saving devices” for assembly lines. We may not reference these labor-saving devices today, but we talk about lean manufacturing, kaizan and continuous improvement. Regardless of the name, the goal is to improve efficiency.

Each manufacturing trade show brings an influx of new technologies aimed at increasing efficiency, and we are steadily pummeled by a flow of marketing propaganda that touts the benefits of technological advances. There are quick-change workholders, improved machine tool probes, advanced cutting tools and vast quantities of other “shop gadgets.”

iStock_000012486825Large.tif

Machine tool builders offer an abundance of options, from simple tool trays that bolt onto the machine to complex cutting tool monitoring devices that can alter cutting conditions on the fly. Many of these products display great ingenuity. In some cases, like manufacturing software, the product is constantly being improved and redesigned to enhance ease of use and productivity.

We often feel compelled to load our shops and machine tools with these products because of their potential. However, I have seen machines with lots of features intended to improve efficiency that ultimately go unused. These features can be expensive, potentially doubling the price of a machine tool.

For instance, a previous employer purchased eight vertical machining centers with options such as high-intensity lighting, automatic air guns, through-spindle coolant and tool and part probes. The lights were never turned on. The automatic air guns were removed because they interfered with the machining operation. Through-spindle coolant was not used because it created mist. Leaving those options off at the outset would have saved the company close to $100,000.

We often find ourselves buying these products because we get caught up in testimonials from shops that have benefited from using them. Our mind’s eye depicts the many uses a gadget could have and how it would be perfect for a specific part.

Many shops do not realize the full potential of innovative products for several reasons, including misapplication. Through-spindle coolant is a good example. It’s a great tool when you need to make deep holes or evacuate chips from deep pockets, but the expenses associated with through-coolant tooling and the corresponding machine tool maintenance can be high. If you are not performing demanding machining operations, through-spindle coolant may not be required.

Finish task to continue reading

Review the print ads from this magazine to continue

This quick advertiser review unlocks the rest of the article and keeps the full-screen reader focused on the ads instead of the page chrome.

MFGAxis MFGAxis Discussion Be part of the shop-floor conversation Like, save, or comment on this CTE story.
Be the first to engage.

MFGAxis Discussion

Be the first to engage.
Scroll for the next article