Help wanted: humans need not apply
There's no doubt that the U.S. manufacturing boom has created jobs. The question is, are they for humans or robots?
Automation, including robotics, has been lowering manufacturing labor demand for decades, but new robots are now taking not only low-skilled jobs, such as pick-and-place, but also skilled jobs, such as complex assembly. The big question is how this will affect the labor market. We already have stubbornly high unemployment, and ever-more-capable robots will not help.
Do we face a positive future where humans and robots coexist on the shop floor or a dystopia where robots make everything—including other robots—while vast numbers of people are unemployed or marginally employed? It’s hard to say, but some of the trends are sobering.
For example, in his New York Times article, “Skilled work without the worker,” John Markoff compared two Philips Electronics plants with similar output, one in China, where hundreds of workers use specialized tools to manually assemble electric shavers, and another in The Netherlands, where 128 camera-guided robot arms do the same work. The Dutch plant has about 10 percent of the Chinese plant’s staff.
“This is the future,” he wrote. “A new wave of robots, far more adept than those now commonly used by automakers and other heavy manufacturers, are replacing workers around the world in both manufacturing and distribution.”
Erik Brynjolfsson and Andrew McAfee, economists at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, said this transformation is picking up speed. In their new book, “Race Against the Machine,” they write that digital technologies are “transforming the world of work and are key drivers of productivity and growth. Yet their impact on employment is not well understood. … When people talk about jobs in America today, they talk about cyclicality, outsourcing and offshoring, taxes and regulation, and the wisdom and efficacy of different kinds of stimulus. … But there has been relatively little talk about the role of acceleration of technology. It may seem paradoxical that faster progress can hurt wages and jobs for millions of people, but we argue that’s what’s been happening.”
Their basic point is that computers are doing many things once done by people, leaving some or many people economically worse off. “The root of our problems is not that we’re in a Great Recession, or a Great Stagnation, but rather that we are in the early throes of a Great Restructuring. Our technologies are racing ahead but many of our skills and organizations are lagging behind.”
Review the print ads from this magazine to continue
This quick advertiser review unlocks the rest of the article and keeps the full-screen reader focused on the ads instead of the page chrome.


MFGAxis Discussion