Skip to content
From Cutting Tool Engineering

Reader Feedback Welcome: Tool Presetting

Cutting Tool Engineering relies on reader feedback to guide our editorial content and ensure that your needs for practical industry information are met.

October 15, 2025

We at Cutting Tool Engineering truly value reader feedback, be it a letter sent through the U.S. Postal Service, an email or a post to one of our social media channels. The reason is simple: your feedback tells the editorial team here whether we’re meeting your needs with the industry coverage we publish each issue.

CTE also relies on a reader feedback survey conducted by Signet Research Inc., an independent research firm that reaches out to a randomly selected sample of our subscribers to measure their reactions to content in a specific issue of our magazine. This year’s survey, which examined our June/July issue, successfully concluded with 144 respondents.

Signet measures reader reaction to editorial content by asking respondents if they recall seeing or reading each of the articles and columns published in a recent issue of a magazine. Signet then calculates an “Editorial Score” for each piece of editorial content. Generally speaking, a score of 130 or more is viewed as excellent; a score within the 116 to 129 range is considered strong; a score from 105 to 115 is good, and a score from 100 to 104 is considered normal.

Here’s how we fared with our June/July issue.

Excellent:

Finish task to continue reading

Review the print ads from this magazine to continue

This quick advertiser review unlocks the rest of the article and keeps the full-screen reader focused on the ads instead of the page chrome.

MFGAxis MFGAxis Discussion Be part of the shop-floor conversation Like, save, or comment on this CTE story.
Be the first to engage.

MFGAxis Discussion

Be the first to engage.
Scroll for the next article