Skip to content
From Cutting Tool Engineering

When Do Premium Tools Pay Off?

When discussing advanced cutting materials, we usually mean CBN, PCD and ceramic.

March 30, 2026By Erez Speiser

When discussing advanced cutting materials, we usually mean CBN, PCD and ceramic. Many people avoid using these materials because they are significantly more expensive, typically costing between 4 and 40 times more per cutting edge relative to a standard carbide insert. A single PCD cutting edge can run $160, while a carbide edge costs just $4. Yet in certain applications, these tools deliver returns that overcome their price tags. This article examines when the investment makes sense and how to select the right solution for your turning operation.

About the author: Erez Speiser is the founder and developer of the Machining Doctor website, which reflects his 30 years of experience serving in management, engineering, production and marketing roles within the machining industry. Combining his extensive knowledge of the industry and web development skills, Erez founded the Machining Doctor website, a platform where he shares a wealth of expertise and insights to industry professionals. Contact Erez on LinkedIn.

What Makes These Materials Special

The defining characteristic of advanced cutting materials is hardness, which is significantly more than carbide. Carbide sits at 1,300 to 1,800 HV. Ceramic jumps to 2,100 to 2,400 HV, roughly 40% harder. CBN reaches 4,500 to 5,000 HV, while PCD tops out at 5,000 to 6,000 HV, making it the hardest cutting material available.

This hardness advantage enables machining of exotic or hardened materials that carbide cannot handle, unless you machine at drastically reduced speeds and can live with poor tool life. The question isn’t whether these materials perform better, but whether that performance justifies the cost in your specific application.

CBN: The Hardened Steel Solution

Cubic boron nitride is the second hardest material known, after diamond. At around $40 per cutting edge, it costs 10 times more than carbide, but its combination of hardness, hot-hardness and chemical stability creates unique capabilities.

Hardened steel: The practical limit for carbide is 45 HRC. CBN handles steel up to 70 HRC, which means operations that previously required an additional grinding operation after turning can be finished in one operation on the CNC lathe. In many cases CBN can eliminate the need to buy additional equipment or to outsource a job to a grinding subcontractor.

Cast iron and superalloys: Carbide inserts run well on cast iron and Inconel, but CBN can run three times faster (up to 5,000 sfm) on cast iron and as much as five times on Inconel. As you will see later in the article, ceramic is the more common choice for these materials, but CBN inserts are sometimes used for finishing operations when better surface finish and tight tolerance are critical.

An important thing to note is depth of cut limitations. You’re restricted by the brazed CBN tip size. Solid CBN inserts exist for heavier machining, but costs become astronomical, and these are reserved for specialized applications where no alternative exists.

Ceramic Inserts: The Economical Middle Ground

Made from aluminum oxide or silicon nitride, ceramic inserts sit between carbide and CBN at 2,100 to 2,500 HV. At $10 per cutting edge, they’re more affordable than CBN, and they deliver substantial performance gains.

For hardened steel in the 45 to 55 HRC range, ceramic provides an economical alternative to CBN. However, for hardness above 55 HRC, CBN is your only option.

In cast iron, ceramic inserts run six times faster than coated carbide, making them very popular in mass-production manufacturing lines, where productivity is critical.

The most popular use case for ceramic is machining nickel-based superalloys, like Inconel 718, where cutting speeds reach seven times those possible with carbide. Aerospace components are often large and take hours to complete. When a ceramic insert cuts cycle time from 8 hours to 2 hours, the higher insert cost becomes trivial compared to machine time savings.

PCD: Dominating Non-Ferrous Machining

Polycrystalline diamond represents the ultimate in cutting material hardness. Created by sintering diamond particles with a metal matrix under extreme temperature and pressure, PCD is 90% to 95% diamond with hardness near 6,000 HV.

Finish task to continue reading

Review the print ads from this magazine to continue

This quick advertiser review unlocks the rest of the article and keeps the full-screen reader focused on the ads instead of the page chrome.

Advertisers included in this article experience

Print placements connected to this article

Cutting Tool Engineering

tolerance are critical. ish and easier tolerance

An important thing to note is PCD insert control. depth of cut limitations. You’re re- stricted by the brazed CBN tip size. Alternative Solution Solid CBN inserts exist for heavier Diamond-like carbon machining, but costs become as- (DLC) coating bridges the tronomical, and these are reserved gap between PCD and for specialized applications where carbide. Applied through.

tolerance are critical. ish and easier tolerance An important thing to note is PCD insert control. depth of cut limitations. You’re re- stricted by the brazed CBN tip size. Alternative Solution Solid CBN inserts exist for heavier Diamond-like carbon machining, but costs become as- (DLC) coating bridges the tronomical, and these are reserved gap between PCD and for specialized applications where carbide. Applied through no alternative exists. PVD or CVD coating pro- cesses, this nanocompos-

Print page 37

Visit Cutting Tool Engineering View this placement in the issue record

The extreme hardness creates very high brittleness, even compared to other advanced materials. This restricts PCD to softer materials, primarily aluminum, followed by plastics and brass. But within this niche, PCD brings substantial benefits.

In aluminum machining, PCD has virtually no cutting speed limit. You’re limited only by the machine maximum rpm and the stability. A PCD edge costs 40 times more than carbide ($160 versus $4), but in mass production, particularly automotive wheel manufacturing, the economics work. The advantages extend beyond speed. PCD inserts also provide superior surface finish and easier tolerance control.

Alternative Solution

Diamond-like carbon (DLC) coating bridges the gap between PCD and carbide. Applied through PVD or CVD coating processes, this nanocomposite of carbon and hydrogen exhibits diamond-like properties at a fraction of PCD’s cost. While PCD remains superior, DLC provides some of the benefits for aluminum machining without the extreme price.

Cermet: A Specialized Option

Though not technically an advanced material, cermet deserves mention. As the name suggests, it combines ceramics and metals, usually nickel, creating a substrate harder than carbide. This enables 10% to 20% higher cutting speeds with better surface finish.

Very low toughness limits cermet to finishing applications under stable conditions. It works best for finishing operations on steel and sintered metals where stable clamping and minimal vibration are possible.

Matching Material to Application

Hardened Steel Above 50 HRC: CBN is often your only practical option besides grinding. The cost difference between CBN turning and grinding operations typically favors turning once setup costs and cycle times are fully considered.

Hardened Steel 45-55 HRC: Ceramic offers the best balance of performance and cost. Start here unless your application demands the extra capability CBN provides.

Cast Iron Roughing: Ceramic delivers exceptional productivity. The six-fold speed increase over carbide makes it a popular choice in high-volume production.

Superalloys: Ceramic inserts are typically the most economical for heavy material removal. Reserve CBN for finishing operations where surface quality requirements cannot be achieved otherwise.

Aluminum and Non-Ferrous: PCD provides higher productivity, longer tool life and better surface finish, but the price is extreme, and not many applications justify the cost. It pays off in mass production with demanding surface finish requirements.

The Bottom Line

Advanced cutting materials aren’t about buying the most expensive tool. They’re about matching capability to application requirements. A $160 PCD insert does not make sense for a short-run prototype job, but might be essential for automotive production. A $40 CBN insert seems expensive until you compare turning costs to grinding.

Start by calculating your current cost per part, including machine time, labor and tooling. Then model the same part with advanced materials using realistic speed and tool life data from suppliers. It may reveal opportunities where premium tools slash total cost despite their higher price.

MFGAxis MFGAxis Discussion Be part of the shop-floor conversation Like, save, or comment on this CTE story.
Be the first to engage.

MFGAxis Discussion

Be the first to engage.
Scroll for the next article