Determining actual wheel costs: General Industry Coverage
Determining actual wheel costs and answers to other grinding questions can be found in this month's Grinding Doc column.
Dear Doc: Previously, our company consumed about $80,000 of Norton grinding wheels annually. After the purchasing manager pushed for management to authorize a changeover to wheels made in China, which cost about half the price, we recently switched. The Chinese wheels seem OK. In spite of this, I’m afraid the wheels will eventually increase overall costs. Are my fears ill-founded?
The Doc Replies: So begins a new adventure. From what I’ve seen at other companies, the following is how it’ll play out.
If, like most, your company didn’t do any real testing, such as measuring grinding power and wheel wear, but just stuck a Chinese wheel on and found, “Yeah, it works OK,” you really don’t know how the Chinese wheels are performing. If you did conduct tests, you might’ve found that the Chinese wheel wore about the same amount and generated about the same grinding power as the previously applied wheel.
But quality is not the only issue. Consistency is key. That Chinese trial wheel might’ve been fine. However, after consuming numerous wheels, you might find some are good and some aren’t so good. Eventually, overall wheel wear probably will be slightly higher, which requires more dressing.
Over time, you’ll probably find that grinding power is (off and on) a little higher, and you must decrease your feed rates. A year later you’ll be operating at a slightly reduced level.
If you do the math, you’ll find wheel-consumption cost is not the killer—it’s cycle time. If you’re running 20 machines for two 8-hour shifts a day, 5 days a week for 48 weeks a year, that’s 76,800 hours. Let’s say cycle time increases 5 percent. That’s 3,840 extra hours a year. If each operator conservatively costs $30 an hour, that’s an extra $115,200, more than the Chinese wheels initially saved you.
Review the print ads from this magazine to continue
This quick advertiser review unlocks the rest of the article and keeps the full-screen reader focused on the ads instead of the page chrome.
Advertisers included in this article experience
Print placements connected to this article
Hornusa
HORN - THE LEADERS IN GROOVING TECHNOLOGY
FOCUS ON THE ESSENTIAL SYSTEM DR Urma licence Sensitivity instead of gross motor skills – this is the motto of the new HORN “System DR” reaming tools. Very narrow cutters, simple handling, and high repeatability when replacing inserts. A large selection of base material, coatings, and cutting geometries make the DR from HORN the perfect tool system for high precision bore machining
HORN - THE LEADERS IN GROOVING TECHNOLOGY FOCUS ON THE ESSENTIAL SYSTEM DR Urma licence Sensitivity instead of gross motor skills – this is the motto of the new HORN “System DR” reaming tools. Very narrow cutters, simple handling, and high repeatability when replacing inserts. A large selection of base material, coatings, and cutting geometries make the DR from HORN the perfect tool system for high precision bore machining. HORN – INTELLIGENT TOOL DESIGN AT WORK. HORN
Visit Hornusa View this placement in the issue recordPrint ads from this magazine
FOCUS ON THE ESSENTIAL SYSTEM DR Urma licence Sensitivity instead of gross motor skills – this is the motto of the new HORN “System DR” reaming tools. Very narrow cutters, simple handling, and high repeatability when replacing inserts. A large selection of base material, coatings, and cutting geometries make the DR from HORN the perfect tool system for high precision bore machining
HORN - THE LEADERS IN GROOVING TECHNOLOGY FOCUS ON THE ESSENTIAL SYSTEM DR Urma licence Sensitivity instead of gross motor skills – this is the motto of the new HORN “System DR” reaming tools. Very narrow cutters, simple handling, and high repeatability when replacing inserts. A large selection of base material, coatings, and cutting geometries make the DR from HORN the perfect tool system for high precision bore machining. HORN – INTELLIGENT TOOL DESIGN AT WORK. HORN
Continue reading
December 2011
Dear Doc: Is there a way to measure temperatures when grinding?
The Doc Replies: A lot of academics have tried, but even under controlled laboratory conditions with test pieces manufactured with thermocouples mounted inside, measuring temperatures is just not feasible.
The maximum temperature is at the wheel/workpiece interface and tapers off quickly—within 0.001 ” from the surface. Therefore, you have to grind through the thermocouple to get an accurate measurement. Then, because of the insulating properties of the thermocouple, it never measures the maximum temperature. There’s also the issue of aligning the thermocouple with the hot spot, where temperatures are highest, which is difficult.
In addition, using thermal imaging to measure temperature is problematic. Seeing the hot spot is difficult enough when grinding dry, and it’s even more difficult when coolant is being applied.
Dear Doc: I switched from aluminum-oxide to CBN wheels. I grind with the same speeds and feeds but spindle power consumption is 10 percent higher with CBN. Am I at a higher risk of burning parts?
The Doc Replies: Probably not. When you grind with Al2O3, about 80 percent of the rubbing heat enters the workpiece, and the rest enters the grit. With CBN, about 40 percent of the heat enters the workpiece and 60 percent goes into the grit. So the high thermal conductivity of the CBN grit means it sucks in a large portion of the heat. In addition to its hardness, that’s one of the key benefits of CBN.
Related
MFGAxis Discussion
Be part of the shop-floor conversation
Like, save, or comment on this CTE story.
MFGAxis Discussion