Skip to content
From Cutting Tool Engineering

Magnetic workholders reduce setup, changeover times

Electro-permanent magnetic workholders offer multiple advantages — even for nonmagnetic parts.

January 15, 2020By Alan Richter

One goal all machine shops have is to improve overall shop efficiencies. Multiple paths are available to achieve that objective, including electro-permanent magnetic chucks when workholding is targeted. This type of magnetic workholding helps end users move more parts out the door, according to Mike Eneix, vice president of sales for Techniks Inc., Indianapolis. “It’s all about optimizing setup time and part changeover time, and that’s where a lot of productivity gains are occurring these days.”

Two other types of magnetic workholders are available: electromagnets and permanent with rare earth magnets. However, unlike an electromagnet, an electro-permanent magnet requires only a short blast of electricity to activate or deactivate a chuck and continues to provide the same holding force even if disconnected from the power supply, Eneix explained. “You don’t have constant electricity going to the magnet, generating heat and creating distortion or warping of the workpiece you are holding.”

Magnetic workholders reduce setup, changeover times
Magnetic workholders are suitable for holding workpieces for five-axis milling. Image courtesy of Techniks

From a safety standpoint, an electro-permanent magnetic workholder will not release a part if a facility loses power while the part is being machined, added Mitch Springer, president of Statesville, North Carolina-based Alpha Workholding Solutions LLC, which also specializes in electro-permanent magnetic workholding.

The company’s magnetic workholders incorporate round pole technology instead of square or straight magnetic poles, Springer noted, adding that the technology provides an even balance between the north and south poles to more uniformly clamp a part. In addition, the technology minimizes stray flux, so chips don’t adhere to the workpiece.

Permanent magnets using rare earth magnets are cost-effective for small workholding applications, Springer noted, but they must be activated manually, which requires internal mechanical parts that tend to eventually wear. Additionally, coolant can infiltrate a unit and deteriorate the internal components over time.

“On the electro-perm like ours, they are completely sealed,” he said. “We have chucks out there that are over 15 years old and still going right along with no problems.”

According to Michael Harris, national sales manager for the East Coast/Canada at Techniks, permanent with rare earth magnets are most commonly used for lifting magnets that don’t require electricity. That type is also suitable for holding large parts more economically than an electro-permanent magnetic chuck. “You just need to position magnets every so often,” he said. “You don’t need the entire part covered with magnets.”

Electromagnets are frequently found on grinding machines, Springer added. “There are still applications across the board for every type.”

John Powell, president of Raleigh, North Carolina-based Wen Technology Inc., which focuses on the electro-permanent design, concurred. “When you have powerful requirements, then those revert back to electromagnets. When you have a small, detailed requirement, they revert back to permanent magnets. But for the general application, electro-permanent seems to be good for holding.”

Hold Tight

Powell said a magnetic workholder can effectively grip almost any cast-iron or steel workpiece with the exception of some stainless grades, such as 300 series ones. In the case of tool steels, high hardness and high alloy content will reduce the holding power somewhat and their tendency to retain magnetism can make them difficult to remove from the magnetic workholder. Nonetheless, the possibility of machining five sides in one setup results in moldmaking being a major application for magnetic workholders. Also, magnetic workholders are available that effectively demagnetize a workpiece, and a major application for those is hard turning bearing rings.

When an end user isn’t certain whether a workpiece material is suitable for a magnetic workholder, Springer said Alpha can make a recommendation based on the company’s experience or conduct tests at its facility to determine if magnets are even feasible. An example is when the workpiece is an exotic metal or otherwise out of the ordinary. “We do a lot of testing for customers before they even go down the path of investing money.”

Another workpiece material that many people think would be ideal for magnetic workholding is armor plate, but it isn’t, Eneix said. He added that some stainless steel alloys seem to be magnetic but don’t have enough carbon.

However, magnetic workholding can be employed even when machining aluminum and other nonferrous materials. The most common way is to build a steel fixture plate that mounts to the magnets while holding the nonmagnetic workpieces, Harris said. “That would shorten the setup time.”

Magnetic workholders reduce setup, changeover times
A-Pods hold a workpiece and are mounted on a tombstone for a pallet changer. Image courtesy of Alpha Workholding Solutions

Most conventional workholding is made of steel, Springer said. “It is usually mild steel. Mild steels are the absolute best to use with any kind of magnetic workholding simply because they magnetize really well and then they let go of the magnetism as well. You don’t have residual magnetism.”

Springer added that some people use Alpha’s A-Pod magnetic modular system when switching between magnetic and nonmagnetic workpieces. Each module measures less than 101.6 mm (4″) in diameter and 76.2 mm (3″) in height, provides 635 kg (1,400 lbs.) of clamping force and can be placed and moved as needed.

“They set up the A-Pods where they need to go and do their magnetic parts,” he said. “Then when they have to switch over to nonmagnetic parts, the A-Pods just clamp their magnetic fixtures that hold their nonmagnetic workpieces.”

Enhancements, Developments

Magnetic workholders have a fairly long history, with electro-permanent magnetic workholding introduced in the U.S. in the mid-1990s, according to Powell, but they nonetheless continue to evolve. For example, he said Wen Technology offers intelligent controls that are fail-safe and enable problems to be easily diagnosed.

Finish task to continue reading

Review the print ads from this magazine to continue

This quick advertiser review unlocks the rest of the article and keeps the full-screen reader focused on the ads instead of the page chrome.

Scroll for the next article