Machining problems? Try universities

Author George Weimer
Published
February 01, 2009 - 11:00am

Got a machining problem? Who doesn’t? But who do you call? Certainly your machinery or tool supplier, but you might also consider contacting a university-based manufacturing research center. Not all universities, however, have machine tool and manufacturing research centers. Actually, a limited number exist.

“It depends primarily on the expertise and interests of the existing faculty,” said Tony L. Schmitz, associate professor in the Department of Mechanical and Aerospatial Engineering and Director of the Machine Tool Research Center, University of Florida at Gainesville.

Each such research center focuses on different areas of manufacturing and machine tool technologies. At the University of Florida, for example, there are three primary research issues.

First, Schmitz and his colleagues concentrate on predicting the dynamic response of the machining system. “Through our research, we’ve developed a method called ‘receptance coupling substructure analysis’ that couples models of the tool and toolholder to a measurement of the spindle and machine,” he said.

Second, they use this information to make predictions of the process behavior in terms of stable vs. unstable cutting and part accuracy due to forced vibrations.

Finally, they organize this prediction data into a user-friendly stability lobe diagram. The goal is to identify stable zones that also meet accuracy requirements.

“I see our research efforts as decreasing the time from drawing to part by improving the manufacturer’s ability to select optimal machining parameters at the process planning stage,” Schmitz said. “A preferred implementation approach for the future is to make predictive technology available via the Internet so it can be easily accessed.”

The overall thrust of the department’s research efforts is aimed at “an improved understanding of the machining process to enable machinists to select operating parameters for decreased machining cost,” he said. “For example, by selecting an axial DOC and spindle speed combination that avoids chatter without the need for test cuts, production time can be reduced.”

Another university conducting manufacturing research is the University of California at Davis. Researchers at the school’s Mechatronics Laboratory, for example, have proposed a compact, hybrid spindle that would be multipurpose and greatly reduce setup time.

Some universities are not as well known but also do excellent industrial research, which is available to interested companies. For example, the University of North Carolina at Charlotte’s Department of Mechanical Engineering is known for its work in machine tool structural dynamics and the chip forming process.

Nearly all universities have mechanical engineering departments, whether they do research or not. “In general,” said Schmitz, “a call from a shop owner would be welcomed. Shop owners need to understand, however, that professors are basically small-business owners, just like them. We are responsible for finding the funding for our students and equipment, as well as our summer support. Research faculties are employed in 9-month contacts, and we must find our own summer salary. We do this through contracts and grants.”

The following are examples of how the University of Florida group helped manufacturers that called for advice and assistance. “I have worked with a tool manufacturer to better understand the influence of nonproportional teeth spacing on milling stability,” Schmitz noted. “For another company, we developed in-process sensing for dimensional variations of forgings that required subsequent turning. We also measured fixture and spindle dynamics for a large part machining operation that was experiencing chatter.” For another operation, they modeled the influence of machine tool error motions for on-machine probing of part dimensions.

Companies should not feel that a call to a university’s mechanical engineering department will turn into free research. “If there is a willingness to fund a research effort at some point, then initial discussions can be very fruitful,” Schmitz said. “If there is an expectation that the ‘state university is there to solve my problems because I support it with my tax dollars,’ then the collaboration won’t get very far.” Some professors, he added, do independent consulting.

The point is that university-based machining and other manufacturing research efforts are focused on the machine tools and manufacturing systems end users currently operate or will in the future. Contacting and developing relationships with them can lead to impressive mutual benefits. CTE

About the Author: George Weimer, a freelance writer based in Lakewood, Ohio, has an extensive background in the metalworking industry’s business press. Contact him by e-mail at gweimer@jwr.com. 

Related Glossary Terms

  • centers

    centers

    Cone-shaped pins that support a workpiece by one or two ends during machining. The centers fit into holes drilled in the workpiece ends. Centers that turn with the workpiece are called “live” centers; those that do not are called “dead” centers.

  • chatter

    chatter

    Condition of vibration involving the machine, workpiece and cutting tool. Once this condition arises, it is often self-sustaining until the problem is corrected. Chatter can be identified when lines or grooves appear at regular intervals in the workpiece. These lines or grooves are caused by the teeth of the cutter as they vibrate in and out of the workpiece and their spacing depends on the frequency of vibration.

  • fixture

    fixture

    Device, often made in-house, that holds a specific workpiece. See jig; modular fixturing.

  • gang cutting ( milling)

    gang cutting ( milling)

    Machining with several cutters mounted on a single arbor, generally for simultaneous cutting.

  • metalworking

    metalworking

    Any manufacturing process in which metal is processed or machined such that the workpiece is given a new shape. Broadly defined, the term includes processes such as design and layout, heat-treating, material handling and inspection.

  • milling

    milling

    Machining operation in which metal or other material is removed by applying power to a rotating cutter. In vertical milling, the cutting tool is mounted vertically on the spindle. In horizontal milling, the cutting tool is mounted horizontally, either directly on the spindle or on an arbor. Horizontal milling is further broken down into conventional milling, where the cutter rotates opposite the direction of feed, or “up” into the workpiece; and climb milling, where the cutter rotates in the direction of feed, or “down” into the workpiece. Milling operations include plane or surface milling, endmilling, facemilling, angle milling, form milling and profiling.

  • toolholder

    toolholder

    Secures a cutting tool during a machining operation. Basic types include block, cartridge, chuck, collet, fixed, modular, quick-change and rotating.

  • turning

    turning

    Workpiece is held in a chuck, mounted on a face plate or secured between centers and rotated while a cutting tool, normally a single-point tool, is fed into it along its periphery or across its end or face. Takes the form of straight turning (cutting along the periphery of the workpiece); taper turning (creating a taper); step turning (turning different-size diameters on the same work); chamfering (beveling an edge or shoulder); facing (cutting on an end); turning threads (usually external but can be internal); roughing (high-volume metal removal); and finishing (final light cuts). Performed on lathes, turning centers, chucking machines, automatic screw machines and similar machines.

Author

George Weimer is a freelance writer based in Lakewood, Ohio, with an extensive background in the metalworking industry’s business press.